Print Story 'We Differ More Than We Thought'
Trolling
By chuckles (Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 04:30:24 AM EST) (all tags)
Mark Pagel
The last thirty to forty years of social science has brought an overbearing censorship to the way we are allowed to think and talk about the diversity of people on Earth. People of Siberian descent, New Guinean Highlanders, those from the Indian sub-continent, Caucasians, Australian aborigines, Polynesians, Africans — we are, officially, all the same: there are no races.

Flawed as the old ideas about race are, modern genomic studies reveal a surprising, compelling and different picture of human genetic diversity. We are on average about 99.5% similar to each other genetically. This is a new figure, down from the previous estimate of 99.9%. To put what may seem like miniscule differences in perspective, we are somewhere around 98.5% similar, maybe more, to chimpanzees, our nearest evolutionary relatives.

The new figure for us, then, is significant.


Discuss.
< Mental Health Update: | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
'We Differ More Than We Thought' | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
It doesn't matter. by greyrat (2.00 / 0) #1 Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 07:47:34 AM EST
After all. Many humans love -- say for example -- a dog, and it's much less than 98.5% "similar". Who cares? It's more a matter of the niggling need for such "precision" to mean something in a case like this that is more significant than the difference itself. I, for one, will continue to love all the women of the world. Diversity is teh r00x0rz!
~
There is absolutely no correlation or causation amongst intelligence, power, talent and wealth.
Kha-Nyou


It's the whole racism problem though by theboz (2.00 / 0) #2 Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 10:20:05 AM EST
If there is some study that comes out saying that people of African descent have on average lower IQ scores than people of European descent, then you will see racism against all black people.  Of course, we would have to ignore the fact that that most African-Americans also have European ancestry, and that averages are not good indicators of individual IQ scores, and that IQ is not a very valid test anyway.

Racist belief and propaganda thrive off of this type of information.  You may be able to love a dog, but do you see a dog as an equal?  Should a dog be allowed to vote or drive a car?  What about the chimpanzee which is 98.5% similar to human beings?  If we view something so closely related to us as inferior, what is to stop us from treating human beings that are not 100% the same as inferior?  I happen to agree with your views, personally, but when it comes to other people, I can see how superficial differences like the ones accounted for in the original diary can be used to harm people.
- - - - -
That's what I always say about you, boz, you have a good memory for random facts about pussy. -- joh3n
[ Parent ]

Nah. It's just a troll. FTA: by greyrat (2.00 / 0) #3 Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 10:34:56 AM EST
"This in no way says one group is in general 'superior' to another, or that one group should be preferred over another.  But it warns us that we must be prepared to discuss genetic differences among human populations."
~
There is absolutely no correlation or causation amongst intelligence, power, talent and wealth.
Kha-Nyou
[ Parent ]

although by MillMan (2.00 / 0) #5 Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 01:19:24 PM EST
a numerical argument for racism that goes "see, we're only 98.5% similar" isn't going to win any new converts in the same way that the creationist museum isn't going to convert anyone either.

When I'm imprisoned as an enemy combatant, will you blog about it?
[ Parent ]

thx by herbert (2.00 / 0) #4 Wed Jan 02, 2008 at 11:47:35 AM EST
Reading that lot has passed the afternoon nicely on a slow work day.




'We Differ More Than We Thought' | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback